Four Functions of Management Essay

1. Explain the relationships among the quatern run fors of management.The four functions of management argon planning, organizing, influencing, and controlling. Each fanny be discussed individually, but as the text says argon integrally related. Each monkey a key role in meeting arrangingal goals.Planning involves choosing the tasks that are to be performed to meet the organizations goals, this is secure to organization. Because organizing is tied to planning it can be interpret as used the planned task, and thence assigning them to people within the organization to put into action.Next is influencing, as you defy made plans, and organized it into task, your regularize everywhere the personnel assigned and how they accession the organizations goals is key. How you motivate, lead, or direct them toward the goals is the primary goal. In a sense, influencing is a way you can make water in the fourth and final function, controlling. By measuring rod the action of the person nel who have indebtedness for the assigned tasks, you can then liken this to expected standards, then either influence them towards to a greater extent(prenominal) positive gains, plan superfluous tasks, or steps to achieve, more, or expand to monitor progress towards goals.Each function with separate is integrally related and implements to repast organizational goals.2. How can controlling swear out a bus to become more efficient?This ongoing touch gives the manager the ability to gather information that measures performance, par that progress to established standards, and then take root of addition steps or changes wish to be made to insure submission with the established standards. This process of continued process improvement, and supervising the results is paramount to achieving goals.3. What is the value in having managers at the calling exploration format within an organization? Why? The celestial latitude stage? Why?Managers in the career exploration stage, ar e in a suppuration or upward bring down in their careers, they are active in the tasks of finding that position that suits them and meets a trustworthy comfort level, these managers are in a learning stage, pass oning to take on new challenges, and try new things. They are highly motivated, and working towards established goals. The objurgate stage is usually identified as a follow on to a maintenance phase, where no upward growth has occurred, and or the employee/manager has begun to stagnant in their position.These older, longer serving employees, have a wealth of experience, but are flunk to meet the originally Scott D. Oramand expected performance standard. They can be used to educate new levels of management, and finding those members of the next generation who are going to become the next set of exploration-minded individuals.4. Discuss your personal philosophy for promoting the careers of women managers within an organization. Why do you hold this philosophy? Explain any challenges that you foreclose in implementing this philosophy within a modern organization. How will you overcome these challenges?5. How will you be able to use the uncorrupted approach to management in your argumentation as a manager?6. How does Henri Fayols contribution to management differ from the contributions of frank and Lillian Gilbreth?7. Discuss the primary limitation of the determinate approach to management. Would this approach be more significant to manager of today than managers would in the more distant past? Explain.8. What is the systems approach to management? How do the concepts of closed and stretch out systems relate to this approach?